Solidarity and Unanimity in Attribute-Based Domains
نویسنده
چکیده
We study the implications of population-monotonicity (Thomson, 1983) and replacement-domination (Moulin, 1987) in the class of attributebased preference domains (Nehring and Puppe 2002 a,b). Both conditions require that when some parameters of the economy change, the agents whose parameters are kept xed, should either all weakly lose or all weakly win. Population-monotonicity applies to the arrival and departure of agents, while replacement-domination applies to changes in preferences. Using results by Nehring and Puppe (2002b) on strategyproof and onto choice functions, we characterize on attribute-based preference domains the unanimity rules as the class of choice functions that satisfy either condition of solidarity and are in addition strategyproof and onto. We also characterize the attribute-based domains on which these properties are compatible. Next, we characterize the class of tree-structured domains as the ones where population-monotonicity and Pareto-e¢ ciency are compatible. Unanimity rules are the rules that satisfy these conditions on these domains. Department of Managerial Economics and Decision Sciences and Department of Management and Strategy, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, 2001 Sheridan road, Evanston IL 60208. I bene ted from very helpful conversations with James Schummer and William Thomson and from interesting correspondance with Klaus Nehring and Clemens Puppe.
منابع مشابه
Unanimity in Attributebased Preference Domains Unanimity in Attribute-based Preference Domains
We provide several characterizations of unanimity decision rules, in a public choice model where preferences are constrained by attributes possessed by the alternatives (Nehring and Puppe, 2007a,b). Solidarity conditions require that when some parameters of the economy change, the agents whose parameters are kept fixed either all weakly lose or they all weakly win. Population-monotonicity (Thom...
متن کاملUnanimity in attribute-based preference domains
We provide several characterizations of unanimity decision rules, in a public choice model where preferences are constrained by attributes possessed by the alternatives (Nehring and Puppe, 2007a,b). Solidarity conditions require that when some parameters of the economy change, the agents whose parameters are kept fixed either all weakly lose or they all weakly win. Population-monotonicity (Thom...
متن کاملA Theoretical Study of Solidarity in American Society: The Case of the “Ground Zero Mosque” Controversy
The paper uses the case study of the controversy regarding the construction of a mosque near the site of the 9/11 terrorist attacks in Manhattan, New York, to analyze the different theoretical approaches to the concept of solidarity. It is argued that the presence of affectional solidarity which is based on feelings of caring, friendship and love was very limited in the case under study. Instea...
متن کاملP19: The Relation between Improvement, Adventure, Social Solidarity and Opportunity, Details of Health-Related Quality of Life, with Perceived Stress among Students
Recently, the World Health Organization has made the need for countries to improve the school context and enhance the health of students at the school in terms of quality of life. This study aimed to determine the relation between improvement, adventure, social solidarity and opportunity with perceived stress among students. During the correlational qualitative research, among the population of...
متن کاملArrow's Impossibility Theorem Without Unanimity
Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem states that any constitution which satisfies Transitivity, Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives (IIA) and Unanimity is a dictatorship. Wilson derived properties of constitutions satisfying Transitivity and IIA for unrestricted domains where ties are allowed. In this paper we consider the case where only strict preferences are allowed. In this case we derive a ne...
متن کامل